Distinguishing between autism and the consequences of early traumatisation during diagnostic assessment: a clinical case study



Imagine a world where social interactions feel like navigating a maze, communication seems like a foreign language, and repetitive behaviors become a source of comfort. This is the reality for many individuals on the autism spectrum. However, the path to diagnosis isn’t always straightforward. Early life trauma can cast a long shadow, mimicking some of the core characteristics of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A recent study published in June 2024 in Advances in Autism sheds light on this intricate web, exploring the challenges of differentiating between ASD and the aftereffects of trauma during the diagnostic process.

The Two Paths Diverging: Core Characteristics of ASD and Trauma


Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by persistent difficulties in social communication and interaction, along with the presence of restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities. These core challenges can manifest in various ways, including:

  • Difficulties with initiating and maintaining social relationships
  • Challenges with nonverbal communication (e.g., eye contact, facial expressions)
  • Restricted interests and fixations on specific topics
  • Repetitive behaviors or stereotypies (e.g., flapping hands, rocking)

Early life trauma, on the other hand, can leave its own mark on an individual’s social and emotional development. Symptoms of trauma can include:

  • Social withdrawal and isolation
  • Difficulty expressing emotions effectively
  • Hypervigilance and difficulty feeling safe
  • Flashbacks or intrusive memories of the traumatic event

The overlap between these two sets of symptoms is where the challenge lies. For instance, someone who has experienced trauma might struggle to make eye contact or engage in reciprocal conversation, behaviors that could also be seen in ASD. This overlap can lead to misdiagnosis, with trauma symptoms being misinterpreted as signs of autism.

The Risk of Diagnostic Overshadowing: Why It Matters


The study emphasizes the potential for “diagnostic overshadowing” in this scenario. This occurs when the presence of trauma overshadows the underlying diagnosis of ASD. The consequences of such a misdiagnosis can be significant. If someone’s autism goes undiagnosed, they may miss out on vital interventions that can significantly improve their social communication skills, ability to manage sensory sensitivities, and overall quality of life. Conversely, if trauma is overlooked, it can lead to inadequate or even harmful treatment approaches that fail to address the root cause of the individual’s struggles.

The study underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis, not just for ensuring individuals receive the most appropriate interventions, but also for dispelling any potential stigma associated with either ASD or trauma.

A Case Study: Delving Deeper into the Complexities


The researchers employed a case study approach to delve deeper into the complexities of differentiating between ASD and trauma in the diagnostic process. They focused on a young woman with mild intellectual disability who presented with characteristics suggestive of both conditions. These characteristics included:

  • Difficulties with social interaction and making friends
  • Challenges with understanding and expressing emotions
  • Repetitive behaviors such as arranging objects in a specific order

By employing a multi-informant interdisciplinary assessment, the researchers were able to gather a comprehensive picture. This involved:

  • Utilizing standardized diagnostic tools for both ASD and trauma, such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ)
  • Reviewing the woman’s past medical and educational records to gain insights into her developmental history
  • Consulting with caregivers, teachers, and other professionals familiar with the woman’s experiences to obtain a broader perspective

Beyond Co-occurrence: The Interplay Between Autism and Trauma


The case study revealed a crucial finding: autism and trauma can interact with each other, creating a more intricate presentation than simply the sum of their parts. For example, the woman’s social difficulties may have been exacerbated by her traumatic experiences. This interaction highlights the importance of a nuanced assessment that considers all potential contributing factors, not just the presence or absence of specific symptoms.

Illuminating the Path Forward: Towards More Accurate Diagnosis


The study offers valuable insights for improving the diagnostic process for ASD, particularly in individuals with a history of trauma. Here are some key takeaways for clinicians:


  1. Multi-informant Assessment:

Don’t rely on a single source of information. Build a comprehensive picture by gathering data from various sources, including:

  • Standardized Diagnostic Tools: Utilize validated tools like the ADOS for ASD and the CTQ for trauma to assess core symptoms.
  • Medical and Educational Records: Review past medical and educational records to gain insights into developmental history and any potential indicators of trauma.
  • Interviews: Conduct interviews with caregivers, teachers, and other professionals familiar with the individual’s experiences. This can provide valuable perspectives on social interactions, communication styles, and any behavioral changes.
  • Self-Report (when appropriate): For adolescents and adults, consider incorporating self-report measures to gain a deeper understanding of their own experiences and perspectives.


  1. Trauma-Informed Approach:

Be mindful of the potential for trauma to mimic autism symptoms. This means:

  • Creating a Safe and Supportive Environment: Establish rapport and trust with the individual. Avoid triggering questions and respect boundaries.
  • Trauma-Specific Inquiry: While the primary focus is on ASD diagnosis, explore the possibility of trauma history in a sensitive and appropriate manner.
  • Adapting Assessment Strategies: Modify assessment tasks or tools if necessary to accommodate potential trauma-related challenges, such as hypervigilance or difficulty with social interaction.


  1. Standardized Tools:


Utilize validated diagnostic tools for both ASD and trauma to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. These tools provide a structured framework for assessment and contribute to the overall diagnostic accuracy.


  1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:


Involve professionals from different disciplines to provide a well-rounded perspective. Consider collaborating with:

  • Psychologists: To assess core ASD characteristics and potential co-occurring mental health conditions.
  • Speech-Language Pathologists: To evaluate communication skills and develop interventions if needed.
  • Occupational Therapists: To address sensory sensitivities and challenges with daily living activities.
  • Trauma Therapists: If trauma is confirmed, collaboration with a trauma therapist can ensure appropriate treatment is implemented.

By implementing these recommendations, clinicians can create a more accurate and holistic diagnostic process, leading to better support and interventions for individuals with potential ASD and a history of trauma.




Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top