Feasibility of a 2-minute eye-tracking protocol to support the early identification of autism

Introduction

 

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a developmental condition that affects how people communicate and interact with others. ASD can have a significant impact on a person’s quality of life, especially if it is not diagnosed and treated early. However, current methods of diagnosing ASD are often costly, time-consuming, and subjective.

 

A new study published in 2024 by researchers from the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford proposes a novel and simple way of screening for ASD using eye-tracking technology. Eye-tracking is a technique that measures where a person looks and how they move their eyes. The study claims that a 2-minute eye-tracking protocol can help identify ASD in children as young as 18 months, with high accuracy and reliability.

 

The Eye-Tracking Protocol

 

The eye-tracking protocol used in the study consists of four tasks that measure different aspects of social attention and cognition:

  • Face Scan: The child watches a video of a woman talking to the camera, while the eye-tracker records how much they look at her eyes and mouth.
  • Object Preference: The child sees two images of objects on the screen, one of which is more interesting or salient than the other, and the eye-tracker measures which one they prefer to look at.
  • Gaze Following: The child sees a video of a woman looking at one of two objects on the screen, and the eye-tracker records whether the child follows her gaze to the correct object.
  • Theory of Mind: The child sees a video of a woman hiding a toy in one of two boxes, while another woman watches or looks away. The eye-tracker measures whether the child anticipates where the first woman will look for the toy, based on her knowledge or ignorance of its location.

 

The researchers designed the protocol to be engaging and easy to administer, requiring only a laptop, a webcam, and a software that analyzes the eye-tracking data in real time.

 

The Results

 

The study involved 101 children aged 18 to 30 months, of whom 51 had a confirmed diagnosis of ASD and 50 were typically developing. The children completed the eye-tracking protocol and a standardized assessment of ASD symptoms, called the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS).

 

The researchers found that the eye-tracking protocol was able to distinguish between the ASD and the typically developing groups, with an accuracy of 92% and a sensitivity of 94%. This means that the protocol correctly identified 92% of the children who had ASD or not, and correctly detected 94% of the children who had ASD.

See also  How Music Can Help Autistic Children Improve Their Social and Psychomotor Skills

 

The researchers also found that the eye-tracking protocol was consistent with the ADOS scores, meaning that the children who scored higher on the eye-tracking tasks also showed fewer ASD symptoms on the ADOS. This suggests that the eye-tracking protocol captures some of the core features of ASD, such as reduced social attention and impaired theory of mind.

 

The Implications

 

The study demonstrates that eye-tracking technology can be a useful tool for screening for ASD in young children, with several advantages over the current methods:

  • Speed: The eye-tracking protocol takes only 2 minutes to complete, compared to the ADOS, which takes about an hour.
  • Cost: The eye-tracking protocol requires minimal equipment and training, making it more affordable and accessible than the ADOS, which requires specialized clinicians and materials.
  • Objectivity: The eye-tracking protocol relies on quantitative and objective measures of eye movements, rather than subjective and qualitative judgments of behavior.

 

The researchers hope that their eye-tracking protocol can help improve the early identification and intervention of ASD, which can lead to better outcomes and quality of life for people with ASD and their families.

 

Faq

What is eye-tracking and how does it measure social attention and cognition?

 

Eye-tracking is a technique that measures where a person looks and how they move their eyes. It can capture the allocation of gaze, the direction of attention, and the goal-directedness of looking behaviors that correspond to visual information processing. Eye-tracking can help assess various aspects of social attention and cognition, such as social perception, theory of mind, empathy, communication, and interaction.

 

              What are the current methods of diagnosing ASD and what are their limitations?

 

The current methods of diagnosing ASD are based on behavioral observations and assessments by trained clinicians, using standardized tools such as the ADOS and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R). These methods are considered the gold standard for ASD diagnosis, but they also have some limitations, such as:

  • Availability: The availability of trained clinicians and specialized centers for ASD diagnosis is limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries, rural areas, and underserved communities. This can result in long waiting lists, delayed diagnosis, and reduced access to early intervention services .
  • Cost: The cost of ASD diagnosis can be high, depending on the type and number of assessments, the location and expertise of the clinicians, and the insurance coverage and reimbursement policies. The cost of ASD diagnosis can pose a financial burden on the families and the health care systems, and create disparities and inequalities in access to diagnosis and intervention .
  • Subjectivity: The subjectivity of the behavioral observations and assessments can introduce variability and inconsistency in the ASD diagnosis, depending on the skill and experience of the clinicians, the quality and reliability of the tools, and the context and setting of the assessment. The subjectivity of the ASD diagnosis can also affect the validity and generalizability of the results, and the comparability and reproducibility of the findings .
See also  Biomarkers of preschool children with autism spectrum disorder: quantitative analysis of whole-brain tissue component volumes, intelligence scores, ADOS-CSS, and ages of first-word production and walking onset

 

How does eye-tracking technology overcome the limitations of the current methods of diagnosing ASD?

 

Eye-tracking technology can overcome some of the limitations of the current methods of diagnosing ASD, by offering a fast, cheap, objective, and reliable way of screening for ASD in young children, using quantitative and objective measures of eye movements. Eye-tracking technology can:

  • Increase availability: Eye-tracking technology can increase the availability of ASD screening, by requiring minimal equipment and training, and by being easily administered in various settings, such as clinics, schools, or homes. Eye-tracking technology can also reduce the need for specialized clinicians and centers, and increase the reach and coverage of ASD screening, especially in low-resource and remote areas.
  • Reduce cost: Eye-tracking technology can reduce the cost of ASD screening, by requiring less time and resources, and by being more affordable and accessible than the current methods. Eye-tracking technology can also reduce the cost of ASD diagnosis, by providing a quick and accurate way of identifying children who need further assessment, and by reducing the number of false positives and negatives. Eye-tracking technology can also reduce the cost of ASD intervention, by enabling earlier identification and intervention, and by improving the developmental outcomes and quality of life of children with ASD and their families.
  • Enhance objectivity: Eye-tracking technology can enhance the objectivity of ASD screening, by relying on quantitative and objective measures of eye movements, rather than subjective and qualitative judgments of behavior. Eye-tracking technology can also enhance the validity and reliability of ASD screening, by capturing some of the core features of ASD, such as reduced social attention and impaired theory of mind, and by being consistent with the behavioral assessments of ASD symptoms.

 

What are the challenges and limitations of the 2-minute eye-tracking protocol?

 

The 2-minute eye-tracking protocol is a promising and innovative way of screening for ASD in young children, but it also faces some challenges and limitations, such as:

  • Generalizability: The protocol has only been tested on a relatively small and homogeneous sample of children, mostly from high-income countries, with a confirmed diagnosis of ASD or typical development. The protocol needs to be validated on a larger and more diverse sample of children, including those from low- and middle-income countries, those with other developmental disorders or comorbidities, and those with uncertain or provisional diagnosis of ASD.
  • Specificity: The protocol has a high sensitivity, meaning that it can detect most of the children who have ASD, but it has a lower specificity, meaning that it can also misclassify some of the children who do not have ASD. The protocol needs to be refined and optimized to reduce the false positive rate, and to increase the positive predictive value, meaning that the proportion of children who are identified as having ASD by the protocol actually have ASD.
  • Interpretability: The protocol relies on eye-tracking measures that are derived from complex and dynamic stimuli, such as videos of faces, objects, and social interactions. The protocol needs to provide more clarity and explanation on how these measures reflect the underlying cognitive and neural processes that are impaired or preserved in ASD, and how they relate to the behavioral and clinical manifestations of ASD.
See also  Evaluation of sleep problems and related factors in children newly diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder

 

How can the 2-minute eye-tracking protocol be integrated into the existing diagnostic pathways for ASD?

 

The 2-minute eye-tracking protocol is not intended to replace the current methods of diagnosing ASD, but rather to complement and enhance them, by providing a fast, cheap, objective, and reliable way of screening for ASD in young children, especially in settings where the current methods are not available or feasible. The protocol can be integrated into the existing diagnostic pathways for ASD, by:

  • Screening: The protocol can be used as a first-line screening tool, to identify children who are at high risk of having ASD, and to refer them to further assessment and intervention. The protocol can be administered in various settings, such as clinics, schools, or homes, by different professionals, such as pediatricians, teachers, or parents, using minimal equipment and training.
  • Assessment: The protocol can be used as a supplementary assessment tool, to provide additional information and evidence for the diagnosis of ASD, and to monitor the progress and response to intervention. The protocol can be combined with other behavioral and biological measures, such as the ADOS, the ADI-R, or the electroencephalogram (EEG), to improve the accuracy and reliability of the diagnosis, and to capture the heterogeneity and variability of ASD.
  • Intervention: The protocol can be used as a feedback and evaluation tool, to provide individualized and tailored intervention for children with ASD, and to measure the effectiveness and outcomes of the intervention. The protocol can be used to assess the strengths and weaknesses of each child, and to provide guidance and recommendations for the intervention, such as the type, intensity, duration, and frequency of the intervention. The protocol can also be used to evaluate the changes and improvements in the eye-tracking measures, and to correlate them with the changes and improvements in the behavioral and clinical measures.

 

How does the 2-minute eye-tracking protocol relate to the existing theories and models of ASD?

The 2-minute eye-tracking protocol relates to some of the existing theories and models of ASD, such as:

  • The social motivation theory: This theory proposes that ASD is characterized by a reduced motivation to engage in social interactions and to seek social rewards, which leads to impairments in social attention, communication, and learning. The 2-minute eye-tracking protocol measures the child’s social attention and preference for social stimuli, such as faces, objects, and social interactions, which can reflect the child’s social motivation and interest.
  • The social orienting theory: This theory proposes that ASD is characterized by a reduced ability to orient and respond to social cues, such as gaze, facial expressions, gestures, and speech, which leads to impairments in joint attention, social referencing, and social understanding. The 2-minute eye-tracking protocol measures the child’s ability to follow gaze, recognize emotions, and understand intentions from eye movements, which can reflect the child’s social orienting and perception.
  • The theory of mind theory: This theory proposes that ASD is characterized by a reduced ability to infer the mental states and intentions of others, such as beliefs, desires, emotions, and goals, which leads to impairments in perspective taking, empathy, and communication. The 2-minute eye-tracking protocol measures the child’s ability to anticipate where a woman will look for a toy, based on her knowledge or ignorance of its location, which can reflect the child’s theory of mind and perspective taking.

 

Source:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-55643-z

Leave a Comment