Attitudes of Special Educators Towards Use of Socially Assistive Robots for Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Serbia and the United States

Introduction

 

The integration of technology into education has been a focal point of innovation in recent years. One particularly promising area is the use of socially assistive robots (SARs) to support individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). A recent study published in August 2024 has provided valuable insights into the attitudes of special educators towards this emerging technology, comparing perspectives from Serbia and the United States.

 

Understanding Socially Assistive Robots

 

Socially assistive robots are designed to interact with humans in a socially intelligent manner. They possess the ability to recognize and respond to human emotions, gestures, and speech. In the context of special education, SARs offer potential benefits for individuals with ASD, including:

  • Improved social skills: Engaging with a robot can help students practice social interactions in a controlled environment.
  • Enhanced communication: SARs can serve as communication aids, facilitating verbal and nonverbal expression.
  • Increased emotional regulation: Through interaction with a robot, students may develop better strategies for managing emotions.

 

A Divide in Perspectives

 

The study revealed significant differences in the attitudes of special educators towards SARs in Serbia and the United States. While both groups acknowledged the potential benefits of this technology, their overall perspectives differed markedly.

 

Serbian Educators

 

  • Cautious optimism: Serbian educators expressed a more reserved stance towards SARs. Many voiced concerns about the financial implications of implementing this technology and the potential for it to replace human interaction.
  • Emphasis on human connection: These educators prioritized the importance of maintaining strong interpersonal relationships between students and teachers.
See also  Attention toward Social and Non-Social Stimuli in Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Paired Preference Eye-Tracking Study

 

U.S. Educators

 

  • Positive outlook: In contrast, U.S. educators displayed a more positive attitude towards SARs. They viewed these robots as valuable supplementary tools that could enhance traditional teaching methods.
  • Focus on student outcomes: U.S. educators were more inclined to explore the potential benefits of SARs in improving student outcomes, such as social skills and academic performance.

 

Implications for Education

 

The findings of this study underscore the importance of cultural and contextual factors in shaping attitudes towards emerging technologies. While SARs hold promise for supporting individuals with ASD, successful implementation requires careful consideration of educators’ perspectives and the specific needs of students.

 

Several key implications arise from this research:

  • Cultural sensitivity: Future studies should explore how cultural factors influence educators’ perceptions of technology and its role in education.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Addressing concerns about the financial feasibility of implementing SARs is crucial for widespread adoption.
  • Teacher training: Providing educators with adequate training on the use and benefits of SARs is essential for maximizing their impact.
  • Ethical considerations: It is important to consider the ethical implications of using SARs in education, such as the potential for emotional dependence or privacy concerns.

 

By carefully considering these factors, educators and policymakers can work together to harness the potential of socially assistive robots to improve the lives of individuals with ASD.

 

Source:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/01626434241270592

Leave a Comment